Sure, the sequel game perfected the gameplay and stuff, but I did really had a good time playing through Witcher 2. but I dunno, I really enjoyed my time with Witcher 2. There are varied opinions about this game and I think it's often viewed as the weakest game among the Witcher trilogy. It's actually pretty well done and I was extremely invested in the storyline of the game. I mean, the underlying concept of Geralt of Rivia is still a monster-hunter shunned by the world thanks to his mutated magic abilities, but the monster-hunting takes a significant back-seat in Witcher 2 because as the subtitle implies, the significant focus of the main plot is a mysterious man going around killing kings and destabilizing the country. The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings is a game that, on its heart, doesn't actually show Geralt beating up monsters a whole ton. I'm currently going through the third game at my own pace, but rest assured that I'll be talking about that game's bestiary eventually. I loved it, read the first anthology novel and played through the second game, finally completing it prior to the release of the Netflix TV series. grittier and darker than most of its contemporaries at the time, but without going over-the-top like some other series I could name. A lot of my friends played the game and I was very swiftly taken into the world of the Witcher, which is. The Witcher franchise is one that is near and dear to my heart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |